BM7P40 - Research Project for Medical Genomics (2017/18)
|Module specification||Module approved to run in 2017/18|
|Module title||Research Project for Medical Genomics|
|Module level||Masters (07)|
|Credit rating for module||60|
|School||School of Human Sciences|
|Total study hours||600|
|Running in 2017/18||
This module provides an opportunity for student-lead problem solving applying knowledge acquired to a specific research question.
Prior learning requirements
BM7001 Frameworks for Scientific Research
The module aims to provide students with the opportunity to:
- apply and develop previously acquired knowledge and lab skills to a medical genomics research problem;
- undertake, critically evaluate, reflect, and report on, an individual experimental programme.
Competence to undertake independent research on a contemporary problem will be developed as follows:
Advanced information searching, interpretation and abstraction skills will be applied in the production of a theoretical framework.
Experimental skills will be applied in the design and execution of a laboratory, field or survey based research programme. Analytical and evaluative skills will be applied to data appraisal and contextualisation.
Communication of results:
Written presentation skills will be applied in the production of the project report. Oral presentation skills will be applied in the defence of the work undertaken.
Learning and teaching
This module will require the student to self-direct and manage their own independent learning experience. The area of research will be matched, as far as is possible with the research interest, expertise and existing research projects of the supervisor. Research topics will be identified during the earlier part of the course through formal discussions in tutorials between the students, the Module convenor and a supervisor who has suitable research interests. The supervisor may be a member of academic teaching or research staff within the University, and may jointly supervise with someone from outside in appropriate organisations. Students can also carry out projects in other institutions, or at their workplace, subject to approval of the Module Convenor.
Topics will be chosen that give the opportunity for high-level research that advances the boundaries of current knowledge but gives the student a realistic opportunity of completion. The module will be delivered through a combination of direct contact, feedback tutorials and workshop sessions (50 hours), with project supervision (10 hours) and self-directed study (540 hours).
Upon arrangement by the student, the project supervisor will initially assist in the following processes:
- clarifying the terms of the research project
- establishing a timetable for the research and dates for subsequent student/supervisor meetings
- directed background reading
- study design, methodology, health and safety, ethical and genetically modified organism approval (where appropriate) and statistical analysis
Supervisory support will form a key part of the teaching method, but ultimately, most of the learning will be student-centred. Supervisor meetings will continue periodically through the project. A typical amount of contact time the student can expect is up to 15 hours with the supervisor. Comments on the draft of the dissertation can be expected.
Students will work as individuals on the design and execution of their projects. They will be encouraged to think critically about their findings and, where appropriate, to provide solutions through the design of related experiments or alternative approaches to research.
PDP: students complete a ‘personal statement’, the style of which would be appropriate to a job application and address questions such as - Where do you see yourself in 5-years time? What are your goals? What skills do you have to expand to meet these? What skills have you developed during the research project?
On successful completion of this module students will be able to:
- establish an original hypothesis within a medical genomics context, based on a thorough understanding of current primary literature, that is realistic and testable within the constraints of resources available;
- design and execute within the time constraints of the project, a series of related scientific experiments to test the hypothesis;
- work safely with due regard to the appropriate Codes of Practice;
- analyse, evaluate and appraise the results obtained, where appropriate using statistical tests at an advanced level of competency;
- contextualise the discussion and conclusions of the project within the wider context of biomedical sciences research;
- demonstrate knowledge and critical understanding of the role of research in the academic and professional development of the discipline and the function of professional bodies;
- write a detailed report in an appropriate scientific form with the correct use of English and defend it during an oral interview.
The assessment comprises the production of an interim report and the final research dissertation, and an oral examination.
The interim report should follow a standard structure and provide for example an evaluation and appraisal of the relevant literature, a rationale for the research, together with the aims of proposed research, methodology, results obtained after 6 weeks in the laboratory, discussion of the results, conclusion and further work with justification. It should be 3,000 words in length.
The required length of the dissertation is 9,000 words exclusive of title page, contents, figures, tables, bibliography and appendices. The content should be of sufficient depth to be appropriate for a Masters level award, but broad enough to demonstrate an informed overview of the subject area. The structure of the dissertation will depend upon the nature of the research. Details will be included in the dissertation Module booklet.
To pass the module students must attempt all assessments and achieve an overall minimum aggregate mark of 50%. Failure to submit reports or attend the viva may lead to a fail in this module.
|Interim report||1, 2, 3, 4|
|Dissertation||1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6|
|Viva||1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7|
In addition to the following texts, primary sources (e.g. research papers, review articles and Internet pages) appropriate to the research topic will be utilised. Students will also be referred to sources used in MSP001N Scientific Framework for Research.
Barnard, C., Gilbert, F. and McGregor, P. (2007). Asking questions in biology: a guide to hypothesis testing, analysis and presentation in practical work and research. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Boyer, R. (2006). Biochemistry Laboratory: Modern Theories and Techniques. Benjamin Cummings.
Brown, T.A. (2006). Gene cloning and DNA analysis: an introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.
Cappucino, J.G. and Sherman, N. (2011). Microbiology: a laboratory manual (9th edition). Benjamin Cummings.
Cann, A.J. (2003). Maths from scratch for biologists. Wiley.
Cargill, M. and O'Connor, P. (2009). Writing scientific research articles: strategy and steps. Wiley-Blackwell.
Davis, M. (2005). Scientific Papers and Presentations (revised edition). Academic Press.
Hughes, S. and Moody, A. (eds) (2007). PCR (Methods Express). Bloxham: Scion Publishing.
Jones A., Reed R., and Weyers J. (2012). Practical Skills in Biology (5th edition). Pearson; Benjamin Cummins. CORE
Petrie, A. and Sabin, C. (2009). Medical statistics at a glance (3rd edition). Wiley-Blackwell.
Read A, Donnai D. (2010) New Clinical Genetics (2nd edit). Scion.
Reed R, Holmes D, Weyers J, Jones A. (2007) Practical Skills in Biomolecular Sciences, 3rd Ed. Pearson
Ringo J: Fundamental Genetics (2010)
Ram M: Fundamentals of Cytogenetics and Genetics (2010)
Gibson G, Muse SV. (2009) A Primer of Genome Science 3rd Ed. Sinauer Associates.
Pevsner J: Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics (2015)
Strachan T, Read A. (2011) Human Molecular Genetics 4th Ed. Garland Science.
Stachan T, Goodship J, Chinnery P: Genetics and Genomics in Medicine 5th Edition(2014) Garland Science
Sudbery P, Sudbery I. (2009) Human Molecular Genetics 3rd Ed. Pearson.
Young ID. (2010) Medical Genetics 2nd Ed. Oxford University Press.