module specification

DN7024 - Research Methods: Success in Design (2023/24)

Module specification Module approved to run in 2023/24
Module title Research Methods: Success in Design
Module level Masters (07)
Credit rating for module 40
School School of Art, Architecture and Design
Total study hours 400
 
328 hours Guided independent study
72 hours Scheduled learning & teaching activities
Assessment components
Type Weighting Qualifying mark Description
Coursework 50%   Critical Analysis (2,500 words)
Coursework 50%   Contextual Report (2,500 words)
Running in 2023/24

(Please note that module timeslots are subject to change)
Period Campus Day Time Module Leader
Year City Monday Morning

Module summary

This module develops your abilities to identify, evaluate for suitability, synthesise and apply design research methods in support of your practice. It supports the acquisition of a body of research methods and a range of methodological approaches that can be adapted and applied to a wide variety of design challenges, providing the intellectual and technical skills necessary to test and validate design proposition, development and realisation through the collection, appraisal, interrogation and synthesis of bodies of evidence relevant to the design ‘problem’ and its context.

Research tools and methodologies must be carefully selected and applied, and their results appraised for validity in relation to the method and the subject of study, in order to avoid the risk of failure in design and the potentially serious or even dangerous consequences of such failure. You will therefore be introduced to a range of design research methods and asked to consider both their suitability and limitations, including ethical and environmental concerns, for application to research for practice in design.

The study of research methods themselves will be followed by study of exemplars that reveal success and perhaps more interestingly failure in design, seeking to understand the factors in terms of research and development (or their omission) that contributed to that success or failure. The study of these precedents will lead to a greater understanding of the potential but also the potential pitfalls of applied research methods for design, especially when they are applied without proper consideration or caveats as to the scope of their validity or applicability.

The aim is to produce design researchers who not only understand how to research for design, but whose first instinct is always to seek to find the tested and proven evidence base for designing, before embarking upon design development.

The module aims to:

• raise awareness of the beneficial impact of rigorous design research by demonstrating through examples how the quality of the design process and outcomes can be enhanced through the application of valid research methods;
• enable you to critically select and assemble appropriate research methods and methodological approaches into well-constructed design research programmes for application to practice;
• enable the achievement of original findings and proposals through the application of design research methods and methodological approaches to design development and practice;
• strengthen both your ability to work independently as a research active practitioner and your confidence to think and act critically, challenging received ideas and preconceptions.

Prior learning requirements

Available for Study Abroad? NO

Syllabus

The syllabus will typically include lecture and seminar discussion of a range of methods and methodological approaches to research for design practice. These will include using both primary and secondary sources, including questionnaire design, interviewing and observational research as well as textual and visual analysis and consideration of ethical and environmental issues. (LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4)

Students will then build on the skills and knowledge acquired in the earlier part of the module in order to focus on a series of precedents or case studies exemplifying success and failure in design which will introduce a range of methodologies including ethnography, gender, material culture studies amongst others. (LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4)

Balance of independent study and scheduled teaching activity

Formal lectures and workshops are supported by individual tutorials and group seminars. Together they provide the support to ensure that the structured content and independent study conducted throughout this module are effective in addressing the module’s learning outcomes and assessment tasks. The module is core, operating within a framework of mutually supporting core modules and curricula, ensuring that course learning outcomes are addressed and met overall. As the module progresses, there is regular interim formative feedback on work in progress that asks you to reflect and identify areas for improvement in the development of your assignments.

Learning outcomes

On successful completion of the module, you will be able to:

Cognitive intellectual abilities

1. Assess, synthesise and apply design research methods effectively, in a coherent and cogent manner, appropriate to the context for practice;

Knowledge and understanding

2. Identify the key cultural, theoretical, ethical, and practical issues and constraints attaching to particular research methods and compensate for them in planning the research process;

Subject-specific skills

3. Develop a critical model for practice-led research, applying research findings to an iterative and self-reflexive process of design research and development;

4. Use appropriate ,professional skills in primary and secondary research; locating, recording, assimilating, validating and interpreting information, presenting your findings in subject-relevavt formats.

Assessment strategy

Students will be assessed through the following assessments.

1. A critical analysis of a case study which clearly demonstrates either success or failure in design; this may be either historic or contemporary.  You should describe and analyse the key methods and methodologies used in the design process, identifying how they contributed to the relative success or failure of the design. The study will include an abstract, a literature review of academic sources and use of images as evidence. (2500 words)

2. A contextual report which will identify a territory of interest for research and which should be related to a potential Major Project.  The report should investigate relevant aspects of the context of the proposed project (which might include environmental, social, cultural, ethical, economic, political, technological or other factors), but not begin or propose any design work. In particular, the report should identify a potential ‘gap’ in existing design solutions and be able to account for their inadequacy. Full academic bibliography and abstract should be included. (2500 words)

The work will be assessed in relation to:

1. evidence of understanding and ability to deploy a range of research methods and methodological approaches in relation to design practice;
2. evidence of an awareness of the importance of selection of appropriate methods and methodological approaches in evaluating the success and failure in case study precedents;
3. the professionalism of presentation of written work with full academic apparatus (including abstract, literature review, correct use of bibliography and referencing).

Bibliography