module specification

SC6005 - Professional Youth Justice Practice 2 (2020/21)

Module specification Module approved to run in 2020/21
Module status DELETED (This module is no longer running)
Module title Professional Youth Justice Practice 2
Module level Honours (06)
Credit rating for module 75
School School of Social Sciences
Total study hours 750
 
56 hours Assessment Preparation / Delivery
56 hours Guided independent study
8 hours Scheduled learning & teaching activities
630 hours Placement / study abroad
Assessment components
Type Weighting Qualifying mark Description
Coursework 70%   Submission of work placement work book
Coursework 30%   4000 word reflective log outlining the student's professional development and a critical evaluation of their practice
Running in 2020/21

(Please note that module timeslots are subject to change)
No instances running in the year

Module summary

This module will be delivered though a placement within a Youth Offending Team. The placement will be designed to support the students gain experience of working within the youth justice sector and applying the Standards for children in the justice system.

This module will focus on national standards 3- 5. The students will be supported by a senior member of staff who will act as their mentor whilst on placement.

This module will be assessed by the completion of a placement portfolio that demonstrates both the student's application of the national standards and their reflection on their own practice and of those around them

Prior learning requirements

Pre-requisite – Professional Youth Justice Practice 1

Syllabus

The syllabus will delivered in the form of a professional placement covering the following:

National Standard 2: At Court LO1-4

National standard 4: In Secure Settings LO1-4

The needs and risks of children in secure establishments are identified, addressed, coordinated, and managed to enable a suitable, effective and constructive resettlement with a focus on continuing desistance

The environment that children live in is rehabilitative and safe, one where there is a culture that enables children to engage in a routine that helps them to develop grow and learn.

Children are motivated by staff to have an opportunity to engage in education and training that helps them to progress and live a crime free life.

Effective communication and information exchange is in place for the preparation and delivery of the secure and the community phase of sentences All communications are in line with Youth Custody Service requirements.

Consideration of the effects of the restriction of liberty informs the delivery of services in secure establishments and in the preparation for constructive resettlement

Safeguarding information is conveyed to relevant parties and agencies immediately.


National standard 5: on transition and resettlement LO1-4


Local systems and approaches recognise and reflect that moves/ transitions for children in the youth justice system can be frequent, particularly for those children who receive a secure order.

Local systems are in place that evidence flexibility and capacity for continuity in assessment, planning and interventions delivery for children in the youth justice system who make a transition/change.

Planning and leadership at all levels, together with strong governance and clear responsibilities, are required to minimise, as far as is reasonable and practicable, any potential for the negative impact that any transition may have for a child.

Balance of independent study and scheduled teaching activity

The majority of this module will be delivered on placement, though a professional mentor. The student will be guided by a placement workbook which will outline what areas of professional development they are to experience whilst on the placement. This will be supported by a reflective log, which along with the completion of the placement workbook will also constitute their assessment portfolio

Learning outcomes

By the end of the module, students will be able to:

1. Demonstrate a sound knowledge of the Standards for children in the Justice System and Case Management Guidance
2. Demonstrate that they can correctly apply the Standards for children in the justice system
3. Critically evaluate both their own behaviour within the workplace and their own ability to work within professional frameworks
4. Evidence the ability to work on their own and use their own initiative in managing a youth justice caseload
5. Show competence in regards to the Standards for children in the justice system and relevant areas of the Youth Justice Skills and Knowledge Matrix at Induction and Foundation level (YJSAKM-I18-25/I27-29/I34/I28-39/I45/46/F23-23-51/F52-55/F55/F60/F62-65/F71-72)

Assessment strategy

The module will have two assessments, one will be a work book that will accompany the work placement and will indicate whether or not the student has met the criteria of the professional standards outlined above. The student’s practice will be signed off by their professional mentor.

The second assessment will be a reflective log, which will allow students to reflect on their practice.

Bibliography

Core Text:

Arthur, R., 2010. Young offenders and the law: how the law responds to youth offending. Routledge, London.

Arthur, R., 2007. Family life and youth offending: home is where the hurt is. Routledge, London.

Burke, R.H., 2016. Young people, crime and justice, 2nd edition. ed. Routledge, Taylor &
Francis Group, Abingdon.

Crawford, A., Newburn, T., 2003. Youth offending and restorative justice: implementing reform in youth justice. Willan, Cullompton.

Watkins, M., Johnson, D., Gibson, B., Stanley, C., 2010. Youth justice and the Youth Court: an introduction. Waterside Press, Hook.


Journals:

Chitsabesan, P., Rothwell, J., Kenning, C., Law, H., Carter, L.-, Bailey, S., Clark, A., 2012. Six years on: a prospective cohort study of male juvenile offenders in secure care. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry 21, 339–347.

Froggett, L., Farrier, A., Poursanidou, D., 2007. MAKING SENSE OF TOM: SEEING THE REPARATIVE IN RESTORATIVE JUSTICE. Journal of Social Work Practice 21, 103–117.
Helping young offenders., 2014. . Therapy Today 25, 55–55.

Lee Van Horn, M., Fagan, A.A., Hawkins, J.D., Oesterle, S., 2014. Effects of the Communities That Care System on Cross-Sectional Profiles of Adolescent Substance Use and Delinquency. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 47, 188–197.

Lipman, E.L., Kenny, M., Brennan, E., O’Grady, S., Augimeri, L., 2011. Helping boys at-risk of criminal activity: qualitative results of a multi-component intervention. BMC Public Health 11, 364–374.

Meek, R., Lewis, G., 2014. The Impact of a Sports Initiative for Young Men in Prison: Staff and Participant Perspectives. Journal of Sport & Social Issues 38, 95–123.

Renshaw, J., 2007. The costs and benefits of effective resettlement of young offenders. Journal of Children’s Services 2, 18–29.

Rogers, R.A., 2010. Soft benefits for hard nuts: the impact of community-building interventions on “anti-social youth”. Pastoral Care in Education 28, 195–204.

Vieno, A., Nation, M., Perkins, D.D., Pastore, M., Santinello, M., 2010. Social capital, safety concerns, parenting, and early adolescents’ antisocial behavior. Journal of Community Psychology 38, 314–328.

Other

National Standards for Youth Justice Services April 2013 Youth Justice Board for England and Wales

Websites
https://yjresourcehub.uk/
https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/youth-justice-board-for-england-and-wales
https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/case-management-guidance